Pcs China
China and India M&A: What is the Deal?
Mergers and acquisitions in Asia have long been the subject of speculation; this is especially true in China, with stories of multibillion dollar deals and government interference; the most recent occasion being the failed Coke-Haiyuan deal.
The curious perception about M&A in China is that the market has been, or is expected to be, buoyant and that recent government involvement on anti-monopoly grounds has “killed” the Chinese M&A industry (PE firms and the like). The truth, however, is that M&A in both China and India remain strong. Few deals are expected to be as controversial as the failed Coke acquisition, which generated a lot of negativity about the ability to succeed in China, yet the real issue was the failure of Coke’s acquisition strategy. So why has the media hype over M&A in China been so off-kilter?
China’s negativity has long been an issue with international media, yet it’s a curious mix. On one hand, Lenovo’s acquisition of IBM’s PC business gets front page news, but at just a little over US$1 billion it was hardly earthshaking. Other Asian acquisitions at the time that were much larger warranted far less media attention. The negativity aspect too, has its problems. The failed Coke bid was spectacular in size and also in testing the new Chinese anti-monopoly laws, which were upheld. Yet the doom and gloom forecasts of “the end of M&A in China” have been premature. Here are just a handful of recent plays:
Spring Creek Acquisition Corp. announces shareholder approval for acquisition of AutoChina Group Inc.
Pfizer’s acquisition of Wyeth? They have a US$68 billion presence in China
Merck to buy rival for US$41 billion - Schering-Plough Deal is latest bid to diversify; Roche nears Genentech takeover
FTC: BASF required to sell assets in Ciba takeover
BASF Agrees to US$4.37 billion deal to buy Ciba
Sinosteel (one of the four large, state-run steel makers) wins its hostile bid for Australian iron ore producer Midwest
When looking at these headlines it is obvious that, far from being dead, Chinese M&A are still active as an investment strategy. However, what about the larger picture and the apparent contradictions?
M&A in China have also historically occupied a rather strange space in the legal services community, with many firms counting China Joint Ventures as M&A transactions. While it is true some assets are transferred, a JV is hardly either a merger or an acquisition since an entirely new company is created to place assets into. The structure of the investing partners businesses does not alter. This “graying” of the distinction over what constitutes inbound M&A in China has lead to a misperception that M&A are far more common than they actually are.
If we discount the formation of JVs in China as not falling into M&A categories, then the number of “deals” decreases sharply. The purchase of Chinese businesses outright has largely been limited to a handful of transactions and has never caught on as a mainstream investment strategy for most MNC’s in China. However, that may change at the smaller deal end as China businesses, buffeted by the global economic downturn, may look to well established partners or suppliers to buy them out as a means of survival – and for the foreign investor to acquire supplies and a supply chain at distressed prices.
There is also the misperception over Chinese outbound investment. With perhaps the exception of Lenovo’s purchase of IBM’s PC business, Chinese privately owned businesses have not invested overseas in significant numbers. Chinese institutions that have are almost exclusively Chinese state-owned enterprises instructed by the State to acquire strategic assets and resources, especially in the energy and raw material sector. Chinese businessmen are also not as well educated in matters of global transparency issues and are cautious about investing in overseas markets they have little to no experience in. It is one thing to develop a Chinese business in China and be able, as a Chinese national, to skirt around responsibilities; often with the collusion of local government. It is quite another to face a different set of rules, IFRS and other protocols, when operating a foreign subsidiary.
While the naivety of Chinese businessmen overseas will change, the truth remains that for the time being, language difficulties and an inability to operate to international standards present a glass ceiling beyond which Chinese businessmen have yet to effectively penetrate in large numbers. The wave of Chinese investors waving wads of cash at businesses overseas is still some way off.
The India comparison
These issues stand in contrast to the M&A markets in India. A report issued by Dynamic Orbits in New Delhi, who track inbound and outbound Indian, is positive on M&A in India. The reasons are to do with the more global approach the Indian executive tends to have over his Chinese counterpart: English language skills, a longer period operating in overseas business environments, and a domestic system that does not tolerate government collusion with business. If caught, Indian officials go to jail, and the media is also free to report on scandals as they occur. While India is far from perfect, the M&A industry in India is alive and well.
I wrote an article back in 2007 titled, “Has China’s Economic Development Hit a Glass Ceiling?”, and to me, it doesn’t seem as if the situation has changed much. One look at the Dynamic Orbits report shows that India M&A is strong, and gathering pace.
China’s M&A is not dead through regulatory interference, however the reasons for growth in inbound M&A in China has more to do with solid strategic planning and taking advantage of low priced Chinese businesses by foreign investors. Chinese outbound investment, unlike Indian M&A transactions, is nearly all state-supported and has very little to do with the private sector. It is, frankly, somewhat moribund and has never really existed as a true market for M&A services.
The two markets are starting to increase in terms of transaction flows, but one needs to have a very close look at the China dynamics before rushing to conclusions over sustainability. India meanwhile continues to conduct its M&A purely on the strength of market conditions – and that is why the Indian market for M&A is looking so attractive right now.
About the Author
This article was written for 2point6billion.com, a China and India business news forum contributed to by Dezan Shira & Associates. Dezan Shira has over 20 years experience helping foreign businesses in China and India.
[mage lang="en|es|fr|en" source="article" backup="sooper"]Pcs China[/mage
Pcs China
![]() |
![]() CHINA 100 YUAN MILLENIUM COMMEMORATIVE DRAGON POLYM J05883001 100PCS UNC US $69,900.00
|
![]() China 1998 1 2OZ Rectangule Gold Coin Guilin Scenery 4pcs US $23,900.00
|
![]() CHINA 50 P891 1999 MAO COMMEMORATIVE UNC BUNDLE 100 PCS US $19,999.99
|
![]() CHINA HONGKONG MACAU 10 2008 BEIJING OLYMPIC UNC 10 PCS US $19,999.99
|
![]() China 1989 Snake 12oz Silver proof coin only 400 pcs made US $19,880.00
|
![]() CHINA Year 1999 $50 REPLACEMENT RMB AI16939901 100Pcs UNC Lions 9999 0000 US $13,500.00
|
![]() CHINA RMB Year 1980 $10 AA79112001 Original Packed 1000Pcs UNC AA Prefix RARE US $11,800.00
|
![]() CHINA RMB 5th Edition Year 19992005 SAME 8 digits 00000836 UNC TOTAL 11Pcs US $11,500.00
|
![]() China 1992 5 pcs Piefort Silver Set Invention Discovery NGC PF68 69 US $9,599.00
|
![]() 1993P CHINA PANDA GOLD 5PCS PROOF SET NGC PF68 69UC US $9,299.99
|
![]() CHINA 100 YUAN 2000 DRAGON COMMEMORATIVE POLYMER 10 PCS US $8,999.99
|
![]() 1972 CHINA BANKNOTE COLOR ERROR UNC 50c 100PCS US $8,800.00
|
![]() CHINA RMB Year 2005 $1 $5 $10 $20 $50 $100 SAME no 8 Digits 03330101 99Pcs 1 US $7,900.00
|
![]() Year 1999 the 50th anniversary of China Jian J58423701 100PCS UNC US $7,880.00
|
![]() 1962 CHINA BANKNOTE COLOR ERROR UNC 20c 100PCS US $7,800.00
|
![]() SOLD CHINA 1980 1 Jiao packed 1000 pcs lucky number 1 9 full sets SOLD US $6,990.00
|
![]() CHINA RMB $2 Year 1990 Original Packed BZ11163001 1000Pcs UNC Lucky Number US $6,900.00
|
![]() CHINA RMB Year 2005 $1 $5 $10 $20 $50 $100 SAME no 8 Digits 00031901 100Pcs US $6,770.00
|
![]() China 1979 4 PCS 1 2 oz GOLD PROOF COINS FOR 30th ANNIVERSARY US $5,500.00
|
![]() China 1993 2004 rooster to monkey 12 pcs silver proof coins sealed US $5,380.00
|
![]() 4th Series 1990 Edition CHINA RMB Banknote $50 100pcs QD41575201 US $4,990.00
|
![]() CHINA Year 2005 $10 REPLACEMENT RMB HW03952226 Original 1000Pcs Machine Inspect US $4,800.00
|
![]() 1994 95 CHINA PRC $5 Kwan Yin 1 2oz 8 pcs proof silver coins set with COA BOX US $4,688.00
|
![]() CHINA Year 2005 $5 REPLACEMENT Notes HY09461159 Original Bundle1000Pcs UNC US $4,660.00
|
![]() China Foreign Exchange Certificate1979 19881set4pcsGEM UNCPMG 66 EPQ US $3,999.99
|

If I purchase a pocket pc/PDA in china/japan, do they come with english as an option?
If they don't come with english, is there any kind of software I could use to change the language on the device to english? I would really like to know this before I purchase one.
No, you have to find on the internet the operating system in your language and flash the PDA, that can be easy or very hard depending on the brand and such.


US $69,900.00























